I was a
little underwhelmed by episode 2. While
the stuff on the Sandbrook side of the plot is all right, the trial stuff is
more all over the place. And since the
trial is the storyline I was more intrigued by in the season premiere, that’s
disappointing.
Hardy
becomes increasingly bent on finally solving the Sandbrook case, and he enlists
the help of Ellie and Claire (the woman he knows from Sandbrook) in a tricky
gamble. As the trial gets underway, the
first witnesses are called in to testify for the prosecution, and the defense
doesn’t hold back in cross-examination.
As I
said, I wasn’t terribly impressed with the start of the trial. I’m still trying to get a read on Jocelyn –
obviously, a big part of that is her backstory, which is being intentionally
kept secret, but her general characterization also seems like it’s still
getting settled. Furthermore, I don’t
know what Sharon is about. As the killer’s
defense attorney, she’s of course aiming to cast doubt on the prosecution’s
evidence, but the way she goes about it in this episode seems at least as much
about stirring up soap-opera drama as it is about defending her client.
The
Sandbrook stuff is better. It’s
interesting to see how the working dynamics between Hardy and Ellie have
changed since they were investigating Danny’s murder. And given Hardy’s “this time it’s personal”
attitude toward the case, that puts Ellie in a position of having to be the
more clear-eyed one, urging him to be reasonable and less myopic. Additionally, there are some neat
interactions between Ellie and Claire.
And
what’s Beth up to? Still continuing her
journey from last season to figure out how to “be” now without Danny, and while
she’s made halting progress on that front, the trial is throwing her for a
serious loop. She’s one of the witnesses
questioned in this episode, and it’s rough.
Whittaker does a fine job capturing Beth’s bewilderment, disgust, and
churned-up grief at the questions she’s being asked that, in her mind, are only
picking at old wounds and distracting from the fact of who killed her son.
No comments:
Post a Comment