"Better a fallen rocket than never a burst of light."
~ Tom Stoppard, The Invention of Love

Monday, March 31, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 10 (2014)

 
Here we are:  season finale of The Musketeers and last Capaldi Fall installment until Netflix finally sends me Smilla’s Sense of Snow.  I can’t say too much about the plot, because there are lots of important developments.  We see the culmination of incidents and conflicts introduced in previous episodes, we’ve got tricky, multi-pronged plans, and there are big reveals to be had. 
 
Overall, it’s a good ending to the season.  The show isn’t high art, but it’s fun and engaging, and I like the characters and plots well enough that I’ll probably watch the second season next year, PC-less though it may be.  The main cast is pretty darn solid, and they all have excellent chemistry with one another.
 
Quite a bit of Richelieu in this episode.  As I predicted, some of his underhanded chickens come home to roost, and it’s good to see the cardinal on the ropes.  Also, there’s one confrontation that really surprised me – in it, he outlines his motives for the regicide attempt he orchestrated last episode, and I was reminded that even at his most ruthless, pragmatism is still a driving force for his behavior. 
 
And now…
 
Accent Watch
 
Besides the RP, there’s something extra going on with his voice on this show.  It reminds me a little of his Charles I voice on The Devil’s Whore.  I think it makes him sound posher and more snake-like, or maybe it’s just his 17th-century accent?
 
Recommend?
 
In General – I think so.  Good, light entertainment with a very watchable cast and some amusing fight scenes.  Nice for a romp.
 
PC-wise – Quite possibly.  PC gives a good performance in a role that was probably a blast to play.  If you just want a taste, episodes 6 and 7 were my favorite as far as PC was concerned.
 
Warnings
 
Nothing further.
 
*          *          *
 
Thanks for coming along on Capaldi Fall!  Check in tomorrow to find out where the blog is going next!

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Capaldi Faves

Well, aside from the upcoming Musketeers season finale, there’s only one more available PC project on my list:  Smilla’s Sense of Snow, which has spent the last two months sitting at the top of my Netflix queue.  So… looks like we’ll have to wait on that one.  I was planning on doing a PC wrap-up when I reached the end of Capaldi Fall/Winter/Spring, but since I’ve got another day before I can finish The Musketeers and heaven knows when I’ll get Smilla’s Sense of Snow, figured I might as well do it now.  Here are my Top Ten PC Projects, in no particular order.


  • Accused, Frank Ryland ~ PC captures the wrung-out numbness of a grieving father so spectacularly.  It’s heartbreaking to watch Frank and his wife in such pain, both floundering but unable to really help the other.  His more private moments are wrenching, and the “Desperado” scene is one of my absolute favorites.
 
  • Torchwood, John Frobisher ~ Frobisher is terrible at times, tragic at others, and PC is superb.  As an ordinary man coming face-to-face with a potential-devastating alien threat, he’s a terrified pencil-pusher willing to do just about anything for his country.

  • The Field of Blood, Dr. Pete ~ Oh, Dr. Pete.  Heartbroken idealist, champion and ally to awesome Paddy, monument to the reporter he used to be.  It’s a small role, but such a good one, and I adore the series.

  • The Thick of It / In the Loop, Malcolm Tucker ~ What can you say about Malcolm?  He’s filthy and forceful, he’s wickedly witty, he’s a Malchiavellian mastermind.  The terror of cabinet ministers and the puppet master of Whitehall.  Just riotously funny, and I’m grateful for the many opportunities that this role opened for PC.

  • The Hour, Randall Brown ~ The Hour is a gorgeous series, and I love the many layers that make up Randall.  I love the glint in his eye as he pushes boundaries, his tremendous capacity for empathy, and his hope in the face of impossible odds.  His meltdown in the season finale just blows me away. 

  • Prime Suspect, Vera Reynolds ~ A stellar early role in which PC holds his own against Helen frickin’ Mirren.  Vera is such a fragile, tragic figure.  You wouldn’t think it, but “Why can’t you take me to the ladies?” is just a heartbreaking line in context, and I’m wowed by the way Vera swallows her fear and takes timid steps toward bravery.

  • The Devil’s Whore, King Charles I ~ Despite its excellent cast, The Devil’s Whore is a just-all-right project for me.  PC, though, is awesome.  His vain, fussy performance as the doomed king is great – real chameleon work.  I just love his final scene in the miniseries.

  • Soft Top Hard Shoulder, Gavin Bellini ~ Of all of PC’s writing projects, I think this is my favorite.  The cracked humor and offbeat dialogue is terrific, and Gavin himself is a delight.  He’s flawed, but kooky and loveable.  I’m glad PC wrote himself such a fun starring role.
 
  • Psychos, Mark Collins ~ There’s something about this possibly-bipolar mathematician that I just love.  The whole “mentally ill genius who thinks medication will interfere with his work” is hardly original, but Mark’s intensity and assuredness is so watchable.

  • Skins, Mark Jenkins ~ At the end of the day, I really do love Skins, and PC’s contribution to the show is excellent.  Mark is one of the best parent characters it ever had.  He’s both outrageously funny and tragic in a “quiet desperation” way.  The final conversation between him and Sid in Sid’s season 1 episode remains one of my favorites of the series.
Aaaaand, how ‘bout a little more?  Although these didn’t make the Top Ten cut, they’re all additional favorites of mine for one reason or another.


  • Doctor Who, Caecilius ~ Fun performance in one of my favorite David Tennant episodes.  I hope the new season refers to Twelve’s resemblance to Caecilius, even in passing.

  • Chandler & Co., Larry Blakeson ~ Come on, who doesn’t love a prickly P.I. with tons of spy gadgets and plenty of sleuthing know-how?  A great part in a very enjoyable series.
 
  • Local Hero, Danny Oldsen ~ Danny!  PC really burst onto the acting scene in a delightful, winning way.  I get such a kick out of this gangly, offbeat oil representative.
 
  • The Greatest Store in the World, Mr. Whiskers ~ I’m not quite sure why I like this one so much.  Chalk it up to my weakness for scrappy, resourceful moppets making their way through the world.  Both the movie and Mr. Whiskers himself are unexpected treats.

  • Inside the Mind of Leonardo, Leonardo Da Vinci ~ Beautiful, sensuous, inventive documentary.  Dynamic and laser-focused performance by PC.  What’s not to like?

  • Neverwhere, Islington ~ Long live Gaiman!  So creative and engrossing, with terrific dialogue.  This small but pivotal role is a great, very different sort of performance for PC.

  • The Crow Road, Rory McHoan ~ I adore this well-written, finely-acted miniseries.  The short glimpses we get of Rory suggest quite a rich character.

  • Aftersun, Jim ~ He’s a bit boring, a bit pedantic, a bit absurd, but what can I say?  Jim is great – such a real character.  The poolside confrontation is a wonderful scene.

  • The Cricklewood Greats, Peter Capaldi ~ Our PC writing/directing/acting triple-whammy.  From the note-perfect satire to the uniquely wild details, this one’s pure fun.
 
  • The First King of Mars, The Captain ~ I’ve really learned to appreciate something that makes me laugh with just audio.  PC’s unhinged monologues are an absolute stitch.

Saturday, March 29, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 9 – “Knight Takes Queen” (2014)

 
Say what you will about Richelieu; when he’s of a mind to, he will go to extraordinary lengths to keep his employer satisfied.  So the king is infatuated with a good-natured German woman with a large dowry and a fondness for shooting?  And because he’s a whiny little snot, he flails around complaining that his queen is ruining his happiness by continuing to have a pulse?  No problem, sire – Richelieu is on it.
 
Needlessly to say, despicable Richelieu is in full force today.  He’s sneaky, cold-blooded, and more than a little reckless (his less cardinal-like actions are in danger of being found out,) but he’s still eminently pragmatic.  When his main stratagem appears to falter, he doesn’t waste a second.  He thinks on his feet throughout, course-correcting and working out contingency plans.  It seems his character is being set up for big developments in next episode’s season finale.
 
Since cardinals apparently can’t make omelets without having a few queens assassinated, the musketeers have their work cut out for them.  They’ve accompanied her majesty on a retreat, and what began as a glorified babysitting gig quickly becomes a life-or-death mission – funny how often that seems to happen to them.  They divide and conquer, with D’Artagnan and Porthos running out to find reinforcements (and attempt to discover who the mysterious would-be assassins are) while Athos and Aramis desperately try to protect the queen.
 
I should point out that I don’t currently have access to the season finale, as it hasn’t aired yet.  Hopefully, I’ll be able to see it by Monday, so look for my review then.  I’ll cook up something to post in the interim.

Friday, March 28, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 8 – “The Challenge” (2014)

 
The A-plot today is a D’Artagnan story, and as such, it’s a “D’Artagnan is out to prove himself!” story.  The king and the cardinal have a wager going, that age-old question – who would win in a fight between…?  In this case, it’s one of the king’s musketeers and one of Richelieu’s Red Guard (in my opinion, not nearly as exciting as the Thor vs. Hulk showdown we got in The Avengers.)  A champion from each group will be chosen, and everyone will enjoy a little 17th-century grudge match.
 
D’Artagnan is bound and determined that the musketeer champion should be him, for a number of reasons.  He could do with the generous prize money if he wins, he wants to display his skills before the king and the musketeers’ captain, and most of all, he wants to show that he’s ready to fight with the big boys.  As his friends point out, he’s currently a musketeer “in all but name,” and winning the competition could finally earn him a commission.
 
In the process, we learn a little more about D’Artagnan, both his strengths and weaknesses.  He’s far from my favorite character in the show, so luckily for me, we have some nice material from all the musketeers today.  Athos helps D’Artagnan train, and he reveals just how well he’s come to know his new friend, along with the traits the two men share.  Meanwhile, Aramis and Porthos are on the lookout for “patronesses” to supply them with their own admission fees for the competition, and Porthos has a rather lovely side plot with the kind widow he pursues.
 
And Richelieu?  After some important developments for his character in episode 7, he doesn’t seem to have taken much of anything to heart.  He’s chiefly focused on the bet, and he makes a few unsporting (and awfully foolhardy) decisions in the hopes of ensuring his victory.  Not his best hour.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 7 – “A Rebellious Woman” (2014)

 
We continue to take turns highlighting the younger main cast members who cut more dashing figures (Athos is back on top today,) but we also get huge swathes of Richelieu in this episode.  I wouldn’t be surprised if at least a third of PC’s screentime for the entire season can be found here.
 
Richelieu has his hands full dealing with an aristocratic woman who’s committed the grave crime of championing women’s education.  Going far beyond embroidery and needlework for the upper classes, she teaches equality, the sciences, and social justice, to name a few.  She even – gasp! – believes women shouldn’t be treated like broodmares sold to foster “good matches.”  Clearly, a person like that can’t be allowed walking around.
 
Initially, Richelieu’s chief interest is financial; the country is in need of a new lady, and the fortune of a disgraced aristocrat could furnish it nicely.  He prepares for a little underhanded mudslinging to unseat his new foe, but the arrival of an emissary from the pope requires him to up his game.  As it happens, Richelieu could use some extra brownie points with his Holiness, and making an example of a woman-educating “heretic” is just the thing.  The time for discrediting clearly has passed:  it’s a full-fledged witch hunt now.
 
It’s always interesting to see how period pieces handle social issues, and “the woman question” is a good one.  I have a soft spot for watching intelligent female characters do battle in worlds where all the power is in other hands, so that aspect of this episode appeals to me a lot.  However, I’m not sure how realistic it is that all the musketeers are so respectful of the intellects and beliefs of the other sex.  It’s a tricky conundrum – is it even possible to keep period characters likeable while maintaining historically-typical attitudes?  Something tells me the past didn’t have nearly as many open-minded people as film and television would have me believe.  (Of course, they were probably much dirtier and had far worse teeth as well.) 
 
On the one hand, that feels disingenuous, but on the other, I don’t want to root for characters with horrendously outdated prejudices.  It’s why I ultimately didn’t mind how Downton Abbey handled things with Thomas in series 3.  In the back of my head, I was going, “No way would this have happened,” but in my heart, I didn’t want to hear these characters saying vile things about him.  It was bad to enough to hear Carson’s “sympathetic” reaction that it wasn’t Thomas’s fault nature had made him into something foul and twisted; I don’t know if I could’ve handled more outright hate and continued to like anyone on that show.
 
And yes, I realize this may seem at odds with what I said earlier about my appreciation for The Musketeers’ efforts at diversity.  While the show makes nods to racial issues, especially with Porthos, I’ll admit that it’s fairly unrealistic on that front too.  I’m not sure why it doesn’t stand out to me as much as the gender stuff does here.  Maybe it’s because racial inequality has only been dealt with sparingly, as opposed to this episode’s very intentional exploration of gender inequality, and so the musketeers’ enlightened attitudes are more evident?   Maybe it’s a white privilege thing, and I need to make a more conscious effort to recognize it?  Maybe it’s because the good of more open casting trumps the bad of sanitizing historical prejudice?  I don’t know.  I’ll try and keep my eyes open on this subject.

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 6 – “The Exiles” (2014)

 
Ole Richelieu is in pretty fine form today.  He’s running a handful of delicate stratagems with lives in the balance, he’s playing players, and he’s pragmatic to the point of ruthlessness.  I think the Richelieu seen here and in episode 4 is probably my favorite.  He’s someone wearing a black hat for the sake of France, keeping his sights set firmly on the end that justifies his means (in his eyes, anyway.)  It’s not as colorful a characterization as his more outright wickedness in the pilot, but I think it’s a bit more engaging.
 
Plus, I think if I had to manage King Louis, I might be a little evil too.  The things that man puts up with.  “The Exiles” really hammers home the fact that the king is not just weak-willed and basically useless – he’s also exceedingly petulant.  In this episode, Richelieu points out that he may want to refrain from going out hunting when there’s an active assassination threat in the area, and he literally throws a tantrum and goes to sulk in his room.  The king of France, everybody.
 
The main cast is split between two storylines here.  The king’s mother, exiled due to her earlier attempt to seize the throne, has returned to court and is begging for asylum.  There are enemies at her heels, and Athos and Porthos deal with this threat (along with the ensuing family drama/king petulance among the royals) while D’Artagnan and Aramis are sent elsewhere.  Richelieu has dispatched them for reasons unknown to retrieve a peasant woman and her infant son.  Naturally, the baby is kidnapped the second they arrive, and much is done to recover him, and to discover the cardinal’s interest in him.
 
The baby’s mother is played by Amy Nuttall, Ethel from Downton Abbey.  I don’t know if it’s just her thing to play women in period pieces whose infant sons are the cause of all their troubles, but she seems to be carving out a niche for herself.  I will say, though, that I enjoy her more here than I ever did as Ethel.
 
Oh, and one little bit of business.  There is a moment in this episode in which Aramis shoots a man in the head while the man is holding a knife to the throat of a struggling woman and Aramis is in mid-leap.  Even leaving aside the complete ridiculousness of his success, who does that?  Who says, “I definitely should not wait until both my feet are the ground before I deliver this precision kill-shot without blowing this nice struggling woman’s head off”?  I mean, come on!

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 5 – “The Homecoming” (2014)

 
Musketeer-wise, Porthos got some extra attention in episode 3, but “The Homecoming” definitely puts him center stage.  I’m reminded of the first season of Torchwood, where each of the supporting cast had one story more squarely focused on them in the midst of the Gwen-centric episodes and the ensemble offerings (“Greeks Bearing Gifts” for Tosh, “Ghost Machine” for Owen, and “Cyberwoman” for Ianto, in case anyone’s eager for a few seconds of Torchwood geekery.)
 
So, episode 5 finds Porthos in a spot of bother.  He’s been accused of a drunken manslaughter, and while his fellow musketeers try to prove that the dead man fell by someone else’s hand, Porthos is brought back to his old haunt.  The Court of Miracles, which I mainly know from the Disney version of The Hunchback of Notre, is the thieves’ den the orphaned Porthos sprung from.  At the Court, he’s reacquainted with friends from his hungrier, less honorable days.  Essentially, it’s the old “you can never go home again (especially if you pulled yourself out of the gutter)” story, but with more sword fighting.
 
Very little Richelieu today.  A bit of scheming, a bit of advising, a bit of treacherous activity, a lot of barely-concealed disdain for the king.  Wash, rinse, repeat.  Now that PC is the Doctor, there’s a fairly good chance he won’t be too available for the show’s second season.  Having some PC in your show is always a good thing, but given how scantly they’ve used him so far, it might not be any great loss.
 
On a side note, I like the way that the series doesn’t insist on an all-white cast.  Two of the musketeers, as well as incidental one-shot characters, have been played by people of color, and I appreciate it.  It’s depressingly easy for movies or TV to homogenize in the name of alleged historical accuracy, and it’s nice to see a show incorporating PoCs without making a big deal of it.

Monday, March 24, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 4 – “The Good Soldier” (2014)

 
I think the show has stepped up its game the last couple of episodes.  The drama has been more compelling, and the humor has struck a more successful balance between fun and hokey.  We’re getting to know the individual musketeers a little more beyond their larger archetypal identities of the initial episodes.
 
Yesterday, we got backstory on Athos, and Porthos had some heavy investment in the story at hand.  It’s Aramis’s turn in the spotlight today, and D’Artagnan seems a bit more integrated into the group.  Anyway, what begins as a simple but dull assignment – standing at attention while the Duke of Savoy and his wife (the king’s sister) pay a courtly visit – immediately goes haywire.  An assassination attempt is made on the duke, and that’s just the jumping-off point for revelations of conspiracy, betrayal, and international espionage.  The musketeers’ faith in the system to which they’ve devoted themselves is shaken.
 
At first, I was concerned that Richelieu wasn’t going to deliver on his early promise of entertaining villainy.  It seems like he’s been progressively less shady with every passing episode, but today’s outing takes a step back towards his original nefarious direction.  Basically, the good cardinal is up to his eyeballs in intrigue, and while he’s not outright despicable, his scenes have a little more weight behind them.
 
In particular, he has an excellent scene in which he goes head-to-head with the duke.  The king of France is an overgrown teenager, who makes shows of defiance but generally toes the line.  The duke of Savoy, however, is a grown man who’s been to a few rodeos, and he’s not so eager to be managed.  The two have words, and Richelieu proves he’s not a man to be trifled with.
 
Sharp-eyed Whovians will recognized Adrian Schiller, who played Uncle in “The Doctor’s Wife.”  And I can’t end this review without mentioning the fabulous JJ Field, appearing in this episode as a former musketeer.  I first saw him as a tremendous Henry Tilney in Northanger Abbey a handful of years ago (my introduction to the wonderful world of cinematic Austen,) and he was also in the Sally Lockhart Mystery films with Billie Piper and Matt Smith (post- and pre-Who, respectively.)  He’s a great actor, and I always enjoy seeing him.

Sunday, March 23, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 3 – “Commodities” (2014)

 
Some heavy stuff going down in this episode.  For today’s main plot, our heroes are enlisted to protect Bonnaire, a full-of-himself privateer, on his way to Paris.  Bonnaire has just recently returned from an expedition abroad and has been greeted by a number of enemies.  Over the course of their involvement, the musketeers discover exactly how Bonnaire acquired himself so many foes, and the discovery isn’t pretty.
 
There’s also a bit of headway made on one of the ongoing series arcs – backstory on the connection between musketeer Athos and Milady, 17th-century femme fatale and Richelieu’s own personal weapon.  We saw from the start that there’s a past between the two, but we get more details in this episode, far beyond the hints received until now.
 
I’m not sure what I think about Milady.  She’s tough, intelligent, and deadly, that’s for sure.  However, I get a little tired of the whole female-antagonist-as-seductress trope.  It’d be nice to see a female villain – especially an attractive one like Milady – who didn’t use sex and her “feminine wiles” to trip up/manipulate/lure men into her trap.  I’m not against it as a narrative device in principle, but it just gets boring.  I’d love to see female baddies with more varied tricks up their sleeves.  Granted, this story is set in an era when women had far fewer educational opportunities and legal rights, which reduced the number of tools at their disposal.  Still, a little more creativity would be great.
 
Not too much Richelieu today.  Aside from a little opportunistic grasping, he chiefly advises the king.  You can tell he basically feels contempt for his monarch and gets annoyed whenever the king gets ideas in his head that Richelieu didn’t put there. 
 
Bonnaire, I should tell you, is played by James Callis, better known as Gaius Baltar from Battlestar Galactica.  I’m ambivalent on the performance, though.  Baltar was excellent, but he uses such a strange, affected voice as Bonnaire that it throws me.

Saturday, March 22, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 2 – “Sleight of Hand” (2014)

 
Well, D’Artagnan has officially joined the folds of the musketeers now.  His first major task involves getting himself imprisoned – talk about hazing the new guy.  No, he’s actually undercover, investigating a possible assassination plot against the king and queen.  While the musketeers take bodyguard duty, D’Artagnan tries to gather intel and pass it on to his new friends/associates.
 
The musketeers are proving themselves to be cocky but capable.  They’re a very swashbuckling trio (now quartet, of course, but D’Artagnan has a pretty different temperament.)  They enjoy a bit of action – in both the violent and amorous senses – and they don’t have much problem flouting authority, but they’re definitely loyal to the crown, and when it comes to getting the job done, they deliver.
 
Richelieu is a little less dastardly in this episode.  He liaises with the musketeers about the assassination plot, and you get the sense that he really considers his ultimate goal to be for the best of France – it just so happens that France is “best off” when he is in a position of power as the king’s puppet master.  Funny how things work out like that.
 
In a way, he’s like Malcolm, who is unscrupulously devoted to his party and feels it can only stay on top if he’s running the show.  Richelieu isn’t as entertaining or awesome as Malcolm, but the parallels are there.  We’ll see how much his ambitions actually benefit France, and how much he just uses France to justify his pursuit of power.

Friday, March 21, 2014

The Musketeers: Series 1, Episode 1 – “Friends and Enemies” (2014)

 
The snow outside my apartment and the below-freezing temperatures will laugh at this, but we are now technically out of winter.  That’s right:  it’s Capaldi Spring.  Not that we’ll make it through another season.  This is one of the last PC projects I have access to, so new that it’s still airing in the U.K.  The season’s almost finished, though, and I have a decent head start, so I should almost be able to make it to the end without any breaks.
 
This show is of course exactly what you expect, D’Artagnan and his all-for-one pals.  I’ve not read The Three Musketeers, so I don’t know if the series follows the novel or if it just puts the characters in new plots.  Seems like it’ll be fairly serialized; several wheels are clearly set in motion in the pilot.  Additionally, all the characters are introduced, and D’Artagnan, earnest and newly fatherless, is brought into the musketeers’ sphere through a case of mistaken identity.
 
PC is a regular in this series, playing the shady Cardinal Richelieu.  Despite his position, Richelieu is quite fond of his vices.  He’s dangerously possessive of his preferred mistress, and he has very few scruples when it comes to retaining the ear of the king.
 
So far, he seems like a black-hat-wearing baddie through and through.  He also has a talent for self-justification and is impervious to any disparaging remarks made by those appalled at his actions.  Nothing especially complex yet, but it’s early days.  While I don’t imagine anything revelatory, it may prove to be a pretty enjoyable role.
 
D’Artagnan is played by Luke Pasqualino, who was Freddie on Skins.  On the musketeer side, we have Santiago Cabrera (Isaac, the painter/prophet from Heroes) and Tom Burke, who I remember best as the lad who did all the transcriptions in State of Play.  This episode also features David Verrey from the unfortunate Slitheen two-parter on the first series of Who.
 
First impressions:
 
Accent Watch
 
A decent RP.
 
Recommend?
 
In General – Possibly.  It strikes me so far as mindlessly enjoyable entertainment – not great television, but amusing enough.
 
PC-wise – Maybe.  He obviously has a prominent role.  We’ll see how Richelieu is used in the coming episodes.
 
Warnings
 
Sexual content (including references to prostitution,) drinking, and lots of 17th-century violence, mostly swordfights.

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Come on Up to the House (2009)

 
Come on Up to the House is a fifteen-minute BBC radio play.  Like The First King of Mars, it’s performed by PC as a long monologue, despite indications that he’s speaking to someone.  The tone and subject matter, however, couldn’t be more different.
 
This play is part of a program that put on dramatized writings based on Tom Waits songs (since, once again, this is radio and has no visuals, Waits is pictured in lieu of PC.)  I’m not familiar with much of Tom Waits’s music, and apart from the brief clips played during the play, I’ve never heard “Come on Up to the House.”  Essentially, the story is a one-sided conversation in which a man confesses his fears, struggles, and heartaches to someone unspecified in the middle of the night.  We get hints of his personal tragedies, his herculean efforts to drag himself through the day, and his musings on the nature of grief.
 
Obviously, PC plays our unnamed man.  We get more of a sense of how he is rather than who he is.  He’s a very thoughtful man who really pays attention to words and their connotations – he mulls over his word choices with fastidious caution.  He’s been “getting by” and pretending to be all right for far too long, and he’s finally hit his breaking point.  There’s pain inside him that simply has to be given voice.
 
PC’s performance is very heartfelt, very affecting.  I’m reminded of his roles in Accused (that oppressive sense of being wrung out by grief) and The Field of Blood (that hurts-behind-the-eyes physical and spiritual exhaustion.)  As with those performances, the relative lack of emotion in his voice only serves to make the emotional content more poignant.  You get the sense that he may not have many tears left in him, but that hasn’t lightened his load at all.  The writing is beautifully sincere, and PC delivers it wonderfully.
 
I’ve always loved the interaction between stories and music.  I think it’s fascinating to listen to a song inspired by a movie or a book, I enjoy discovering poetic homages within lyrics, I appreciate how a well-chosen song can elevate a film or television scene, and here, I really like the way the emotional resonance of a song is transposed into a performed story.
 
Accent Watch
 
Scottish.
 
Recommend?
 
In General – I think I would.  It’s quite melancholy, but it’s written with such loveliness and grace.  Worth a listen, I’d say.
 
PC-wise – Yes.  PC has a great talent for these sorts of quietly-heartbroken characters.
 
Warnings
 
Nothing of note.

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Lost for Words (1997)

 
Not sure how I managed it, but I seem to have forgotten to post my review from yesterday.  Dreadfully sorry, and I'm sure you've been impatiently awaiting a bit of good old self-flagellation; however, I'm afraid the best I can do is to post it now.  It may put some of my remarks about Salvage into better perspective.
 
Sincerest groveling apologies and all that.  And so... review!
 
Another TV short today.  Much easier to understand than Solid Geometry, despite the fact that most of the character interactions in this one are between people who don’t speak the same language.  I’m not sure if that’s a slam on my mathematics education or a knock on overly-arty short films, but it’s probably an indictment of something.
 
In Lost for Words, we meet a traumatized, unnamed traveler in a bar (in Spain, I’m guessing?  Sounds like most of the characters are speaking Spanish.)  As the Doctor would say, he’s “had some cowboys in here,” and we see what happened to him through an extended flashback.  Our traveler, an Englishman abroad, speaks little Spanish and doesn’t have much of an idea where he’s going.  These two factors contribute to, but are not ultimately the cause of, what has to be the absolute worst-case hitchhiking scenario of all time.
 
PC plays the traveler (or “traveller,” as per the credits – oh, those Brits.)  He strikes me as mildly adventurous but out of his depth, his good intentions quite handily paving his road to hell.  He’s also fairly empathetic, which gets him into trouble and winds up involving him in situations far beyond the typical hitchhiker/driver expectations.
 
It’s an effective performance.  I have no problem buying PC as a feckless tourist getting in over his head.  He also does a great job showing the traveler’s shell-shocked state at the beginning of the story.  Almost from the first shot of him, it’s clear that he’s been broken somehow, and he makes you want to find out what happened.
 
This will come up a little more specifically in the warnings, but just a heads up – what happened is terrible.  It seems that at least 90% of short films are either completely insane or intensely depressing, and this one takes the latter tack.
 
Accent Watch
 
It’s a little tough – the traveler doesn’t say much, and a good chunk of his few lines are in broken Spanish.  I think it’s RP.
 
Recommend?
 
In General – Eh… I don’t think so.  I’m not really into depression for depression’s sake.  If I’m going to watch something sad, I’d rather it have more to say.
 
PC-wise – Possibly.  PC puts a lot into the character, despite not having much runtime or dialogue.
 
Warnings
 
Dark thematic elements and a disturbing scene of violence.

Salvage (2004)

 
Just to change it up, here’s a short that wasn’t made for television.  PC really has been in a lot of shorts.  Short film is quite an interesting medium (and a definite challenge, putting a complete story into such a small package!), and it’s always nice to see well-respected actors shining a bit more light on it.  Let that be a lesson to all aspiring filmmakers – don’t discount the value of shorts, because you might get someone of PC’s caliber to be in them!
 
Much shorter than the more recent outings, Salvage clocks in at just under ten minutes.  It is a fairly straightforward story told about an off-the-beaten-path topic:  a man has just begun seeking help for his sex addiction.  I’m not exactly sure where he’s ended up – it doesn’t seem like a clinic or a treatment facility – but he’s been offered the promise of a mysterious yet immediate cure, if he chooses to accept it.
 
PC is our leading man here, addict James Mulwray.  He’s a little desperate, a little defensive, and a little ashamed; very fitting for his story.  Though he’s finally accepted that he has a problem and needs help, you can tell he hates thinking of himself that way.
 
And I like that the film really depicts him as having a problem and acknowledging it as such.  Sex addiction doesn’t get a huge amount of attention in mainstream media, and I think it’s easy to brush off references to it as, “Oh, they’re just sleazy,” or, “Yeah, sounds like a real ‘problem’” (especially if the addict in question is a man.)  Salvage shows that sex is genuinely interfering with James’s life, and he truly hates the hold that it has over him.  In a way, it’s actually emasculating for him that he can’t control himself.
 
Another thing I appreciate is the way the sexual content is filmed.  The sexual scenes here sort of remind me of the violent scenes in Psycho.  They’re shot and edited in such a way that it seems like you’re seeing more than you really are.  It’s not done to the extent that it is with Psycho, but the effect is similar.
 
Accent Watch
 
RP – pretty good.
 
Recommend?
 
In General – Maybe.  An intriguing story well-filmed.
 
PC-wise – Possibly.  It won’t be making any lists of my favorite PC performances, but he does a fine job.  There’s so much discomfort to James, and that definitely comes through to the viewer.
 
Warnings
 
Sexual content (including snatches of multiple sex scenes) and brief strong language.

Monday, March 17, 2014

Solid Geometry (2002)

 
This obscure little project, a Scottish TV short, is actually one that I’ve known about for years, but I haven’t seen it until now.  It stars Ewan McGregor, who was the first of “my” actors –however, this was a good 10-12 years ago, when the Internet was a very different animal overall, and no one was uploading obscure Scottish TV shorts anywhere, so it remained an intriguing unknown entity on McGregor’s filmography.  Until now.  Capaldians, it seems, can find just about anything, especially now that PC is the Doctor and videos are coming out of the online woodwork. 
 
It turns out that Solid Geometry is the exceedingly odd story of Phil, a young man tasked with going through the diaries of his great-grandfather (a mathematician who disappeared under mysterious circumstances, don’t ya know.)  Between the equations, the daily banality, and the sexual fixations, the diaries obsess over a mathematical breakthrough Phil’s great-grandfather witnessed.  Don’t ask me to explain it, because I don’t get it even a little bit – suffice it to say it’s revolutionary, mind-bending, and pretty impossible.  Anyway, Phil’s personal life starts to suffer as he gets more and more consumed by the diaries and their implications.
 
That seems like a long plot summary for a half-hour short, but it’s necessary.  I really don’t get it.  Not in a “clearly, this is supposed to be balls-out nuts” way, like with Bistro; it’s more like it’s playing keep-away with its ideas, and understanding is always a little out of my grasp.
 
PC plays David Hunter, a Scottish mathematician and contemporary of Phil’s great-grandfather.  He’s the one who actually discovers the game-changing principle described in the diaries, and we see him through flashbacks as Phil reads.
 
There’s not a ton to say.  These parts of the film are kind of underwritten, to obfuscate the fact that the math itself isn’t strictly possible.  Despite the scant screentime/dialogue, however, PC does his job.  I may have no idea what David really did, but I absolutely believe that he crossed the borders of human understanding and was simultaneous ecstatic and terrified about it.
 
Accent Watch
 
Everyone’s Scottish here – even Ewan McGregor, and it seems he rarely uses his own accent!
 
Recommend?
 
In General – Not necessarily.  Nice atmosphere, I like the concept, and some of the character stuff is good.  It’s just so odd.
 
PC-wise – Again, not necessarily.  Even in a fairly short project, he only has a few minutes of screentime and not much to do.
 
Warnings
 
Swearing, sexual content (including a sex scene and some nudity,) and assorted substance abuse.