This collection makes for a nice read, with lots of anecdotes and
insights straight from the horse’s mouth.
I’d recommended reading it bit by bit rather than in one or a few
sittings, but it’s definitely a good time.
Just what it says on the label, this book compiles sixteen
interviews with Buster Keaton. Some are
a page or two, while others exceed twenty pages. There are print interviews, transcribed TV
interviews, and a few interviews translated from foreign-language
publications.
It surprises me a little that the overwhelming majority of the
interviews come from the last ten years of Buster’s life, during the Keaton
renaissance of the ‘50s and ‘60s. There
are only three that were actually conducted during his silent career, and then,
they’re very early in his silent
career – the last of them was written in 1923, just after he finished Our Hospitality. I wonder if that sort of thing, celebrity
interviews, just wasn’t done very often in the ‘20s? The first two, in fact, are more
informational than anything else, with no more than a few short quotes from Buster. The third, though, is interesting to me. The interviewer spends a lot of the article
commenting on the interview scenario, Buster’s friendly but shy demeanor, and
the interviewer’s suspicion that she could get a lot more of the “real” Buster
if they weren’t in a studio office with suits running around.
Fortunately, the later interviews are packed to the gills with the
real Buster. There’s plenty of
plain-talking observations on Hollywood then and now (well, in the ‘50s and ‘60s,)
animated stories about a particular scene from this or that film, polite
brushoffs when the interviewers start waxing too philosophically on the Genius
of Keaton, and notes from the interviewers about how engaging and personable
Buster is. What’s interesting is that,
particularly in the ‘50s, Buster’s work had only recently been rediscovered and
had started to be shown again on late-night TV and, rarely, in theaters. So, many of these interviewers talking to
Buster about his long and illustrious career have never even seen the classics
they’re asking him about. That must have
been so weird, especially when you’re talking about silent movies. It makes for a rather unusual interview
dynamic, with Buster telling these interviews what particular shorts or
features were about, but I think it also speaks to how resonant Buster’s work
is, seeing these interviews asking him to describe movies they’ve only read
about.
No comments:
Post a Comment