This is
an Oscar year similar to 2015, in that only one of the Best Actress nominees is
in a film that’s up for Best Picture (Emma Stone in La La Land,) whereas other four films are recognized for Best
Actress and very little, if anything else – in the case of Jackie, it’s also nominated for its score and costumes. The Best Actor race is also a parallel of
2015, since all but one of the male
actors is in a Best Picture-nominated
film. What’s odd this year, though, is
that it’s not purely a reflection of the idea that “women’s stories” aren’t
Best Picture material, since Arrival
and Hidden Figures are both
female-led, but both have their lead actresses absent in the Best Actress
category. Very curious.
But I
digress. Today’s post isn’t about
Hollywood’s gender issues; it’s about Jackie. Framed by an interview occurring a week after
JFK’s assassination, the story flits through the former First Lady’s
recollections both of the assassination/aftermath and earlier memories of her
time in the White House. The major
throughline is Jackie, in the midst of her shock and grief, desperately trying
to preserve Jack’s legacy as president by giving him a funeral for the ages.
Interesting
themes at play here. I like Jackie’s
preoccupation with forgotten presidents Garfield and McKinley and her
determination that Jack not join their ranks, her efforts to recreate Lincoln’s
reverent funeral as closely as she can in a very different world from 1865. There’s this whole idea of who we are, how
we’re remembered, and wondering what our lives will have been for after we’re
gone, or even just after the world moves on from thinking about us as it used
to (who lives, who dies, who tells your story.)
I also like the running commentary on the media, especially Jackie’s
savviness at knowing how the press sees her and how it expects her to be.
I feel
like it’s a movie made more of moments than anything else. It has a number of really well-realized
individual scenes, such as Jackie’s confused babbling on Air Force One
immediately post-assassination, her grieving us-against-the-world scenes with
Bobby, and the careful way she holds and preserves the history of past First
Families. Fitting, perhaps, in a story
about a woman working to create a moment, something to be taken out of time
that will always be remembered.
Before I
get to Natalie Portman, I want to quickly mention the rest of the cast. While it’s definitely Jackie’s (crumbling)
world, it’s well-inhabited by those around her, including Peter Sarsgaard as
Bobby, Billy Crudup as the journalist interviewing Jackie, Greta Gerwig (from 20th Century Women) and
Richard E. Grant as White House staff members, and the wonderful, late John
Hurt as a priest. As for Portman, her Jackie
is excellent. I’m getting passed the
point where I’m spellbound by an actor expertly mimicking a well-known person,
though I can’t deny that Portman’s performance is very faithful – it’s just
that, that alone isn’t enough to win
me over. Instead, what impresses me most
here are the places where Portman taps into the complex emotions of the
grieving First Lady: her carry-on need
to hold herself a certain way before the press, her raw, undisguised horror at
her husband’s brutal murder, and her private chances to let her “holding it all
together” façade drop and, for a moment, take a rest from looking poised.
Warnings
No comments:
Post a Comment