I’m
putting In the Loop here since,
chronologically, this is when it came out in relation to The Thick of It. However,
that’s not to say that it’s a continuation of the episodes that come before it
or a preface to the episodes that follow it.
In the Loop very much tells
its own story on its own scale. In fact,
most of the Thick of It actors who
appear in it play different characters, and the characters who do carry over
are extreme enough versions of themselves that the film can hardly be said to
take place in the same universe as the show.
Since I
first saw In the Loop five years ago
and only watched The Thick of It
recently, I didn’t notice this difference until I saw the film again. It’s jarring to see the same familiar faces
playing different characters with similar jobs – “Wait, Toby? What happened to
Ollie?” I’m not entirely sure why they
did that. Perhaps because In the Loop operates on a much more
international level, crossing the Atlantic more than once, and DoSAC was
nowhere near important enough to be involved in its goings-on? At any rate, it gives the film the effect
that, while there’s only one Malcolm and one Jamie, every department has “an
Ollie,” “a Terri,” and “a Glenn.” Seen
one, seen ‘em all.
The
doomed cabinet minister forever eating his words, though, isn’t a doppelganger
for Hugh. Simon Foster, played by Tom
Hollander, is a different sort of gutless sad sack, and while he makes the same
sort of mistakes that Hugh does, his have much further-reaching
consequences. The film kicks off when,
in an interview, Simon states that war in the Middle East is “unforeseeable.” After having several new ones ripped for not
toeing the party lines, Simon over-corrects and finds himself the unwitting
spokesman of a pro-war movement. Ham-fisted
slips of the tongue aren’t new for The
Thick of It, but this is the first time that anyone’s life is at stake over
it.
Malcolm
is recognizably Malcolm, of course – there’s the swearing, the threats of
violence, and the patented Malcolm Tucker Run in two different countries. Still, the Malcolm here bears some noticeable
differences to the Malcolm in the show.
Malcolm’s underlying belief in his party seems to be absent. When he does less than savory things in this
film, there’s no sense that he views them as necessary for the sake of the
party. You get the idea that he
literally doesn’t care whether there’s a war or not, and only does the things
he does because the PM told him to, and maybe to posture to the Americans and
show them what he’s capable of.
Still,
it’s a great, hilarious film (Malcolm has some tremendous speeches, and there’s
a fantastic sequence of Jamie in full mad-dog-off-the-leash mode.) In a way, it might be better to see it before
The Thick of It. It’s a good way to introduce you to the world
that the show deals with, but it’s more polished and self-contained than the
show, whose loose, improv style can take a little getting used to. By watching In the Loop first, you can get hooked by Malcolm and The Thick of It’s brand of humor, so
you’re ready to dig into the show.
Same
rules apply, though: don’t watch In the Loop unless you’re okay with massive levels of swearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment