When I
found out Christopher Jackson (Benny from In
the Heights) was playing George Washington in Hamilton, I expected the same type of friendship dynamic that Benny
and Usnavi had in In the Heights. Not that Jackson and Lin-Manuel Miranda are only
capable of playing off of each other in one way, but that two longtime friends
of roughly equal ages will have a certain vibe that just comes through whenever
they work together.
In
truth, Hamilton and Washington are entirely different from Usnavi and
Benny. Rather than a friendship, the
dynamic between Washington and Hamilton is that of a surrogate father/son,
mentor/mentee, and leader/right-hand-man.
When these two interact, I easily buy that Jackson is a good two decades
older than Miranda, simply through Washington’s gravitas and the way he regards
Hamilton. It’s an impressive feat of
acting and writing that this relationship is presented so beautifully.
On
first glance, they seem like an odd-couple pairing. Young Hamilton is brash and cocksure,
passionate about joining the Revolution.
He’s incredibly talented and undeniably brave, but his strong opinions
and smart mouth tend to put him on people’s bad sides. This is a far cry from regal, stalwart General
Washington. He’s seen as America’s hope,
its leader and father, and he strives to live up to that mantle with quiet
dignity. However, it’s important to
remember that Washington does have
20+ years on Hamilton; he’s had time to make mistakes and learn from them, and
in Hamilton, he sees memories of his younger self.
Washington
admires Hamilton’s conviction and values his dogged work ethic. He hopes to pass on a portion of all he’s
learned to the fiery young revolutionary, teaching Hamilton that “dying like a
martyr” shouldn’t be the pinnacle of ideologically romantic aspirations and
that what people say about a man isn’t as important as how that man lives his
life. For his part, Hamilton fairly
idolizes Washington, absolutely viewing him as one of America’s greatest men,
but that doesn’t make Hamilton himself a docile follower. He has his own (very decided) ideas about the
direction he thinks his life should take, and when Washington seems to stand in
the way of that direction – refusing to give Hamilton a battalion to command –
he rails against his general. He also
gets involved with petty in-fighting against Washington’s orders and later
makes enemies in Washington’s cabinet, making “Jefferson started it!” excuses
when Washington calls him out on it.
This is
where the father/son dynamic comes through the strongest. Washington cares about Hamilton and tries to
protect him from his own recklessness, wanting to help Hamilton avoid the
mistakes Washington made at Hamilton’s age.
Hamilton, though, resents any suggestion that he isn’t in the right and
chafes against Washington’s firm, caring guidance. He spends a fair amount of time arguing with
Washington, but it’s so different than his conflicts with Burr, Jefferson,
etc., because it comes from such a place of wanting Washington to recognize
that he can do well. He’s so much like a self-assured son trying
to make his way in the world and insisting he doesn’t need any more help from
his dad. Yet, he frequently comes around
when he has some time to cool off, realizing the value of Washington’s wisdom
and experience. He learns to understand
that, when it comes down to it, Washington only wants to show him the tools he
needs to succeed on his own.
Thanks for the analysis. The Hamilton production where Washington orders Hamilton to go home after their fight was a very father-son dynamic.
ReplyDelete