"Better a fallen rocket than never a burst of light."
~ Tom Stoppard, The Invention of Love
Showing posts with label Sherlock Holmes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sherlock Holmes. Show all posts

Sunday, October 14, 2018

A Few Thoughts on Sherlock and John (Sherlock)


I go back and forth a little on Sherlock and John.  I always come down on the side of loving and appreciating this devoted friendship, but there are definitely times when I wish I could love it more than I did.  Today’s post is just shy of a Relationship Spotlight, exploring this duo without quite giving it my full stamp of approval (some John-Sherlock-related spoilers.)

I think a big part of it is that, in my opinion, the pilot gets John and Sherlock absolutely pitch-perfect right.  I mean, the guys meet, Sherlock does his usual thing and John gets caught in the whirlwind, not quite sure what’s even going on but hanging on for dear life because he enjoys the rush.  In this episode, we see a lot of what’s rough in their relationship – Sherlock making ridiculous demands of John, forgetting about him entirely for long stretches, doing secretive/manipulative things without much apparent reason for it, and John is understandly annoyed at all of this.  But we also see a lot of what’s good about it (note:  for the most part, the show makes it entirely clear why John is good for Sherlock, so while I’ll touch a little on both, I’m mainly looking here at the extent to which Sherlock is good for John.)  As I said, Sherlock’s insane life gives John the thrill he’d been missing, and even as it’s by turns baffling and frightening, John ultimately loves it.  Right from the start, John shows what he brings to the table, and even as John admires Sherlock’s amazing deductive abilities, Sherlock admires John’s talents as well.  By the end of the pilot, it’s obvious why John throws his lot in with Sherlock.

The potential in this relationship is shown best, I think, in the sequence that starts at the restaurant and leads to them chasing the cab.  This is a case of Sherlock’s manipulative tendencies being used in a meaningful way and most definitely for good.  It’s true that Sherlock benefits from John parting ways with his psychosomatic limp, since it means a partner who can keep up when the action starts, but orchestrating this scenario really isn’t about Sherlock.  It’s for John, getting him up and running for the sake of something vital and really bringing home the point afterward to make sure John realizes all he was capable of doing without his cane – it’s a very kind, albeit unusual, thing to do for his new friend, and Sherlock was under no obligation to do it.  He just did.

This is where the pilot strikes the right balance, and the balance is crucial to me.  Sherlock can be both rude/oblivious and considerate, much like John can be both irritated and understanding.  And I get that, once the initial rush of getting pulled into Sherlock’s life wears off, his eccentricities and callousness can be wearing in the day-to-day – no doubt Sherlock is an abominably-difficult man to live with.  So it makes sense that there’d be some growing pains.  But as the show goes on, it feels like their day-to-day is more of the difficult stuff, Sherlock bulldozing through John’s life and John coming across somewhere between long-suffering and had-it-up-to-here.  The balance is there, but more often in the big moments, the grand declarations and emotional climaxes.  Sherlock demonstrates how important John is to him when one or both of their lives are in imminent danger (usually toward the end of a season,) or on special occasions like John’s wedding, but for me, I don’t see much in the way of “cab chase” moments, smaller ways Sherlock shows he cares that don’t involve an incentive like a gun pointed at one of their heads.  They show up here and there – I really like, “Listen, what I said before, John.  I meant it.  I don’t have friends.  I’ve just got one.”  But that’s not where the overall thrust of the series tends, and that’s disappointing to me.  The balance is often more skewed than that, and while I still enjoy these two together, every time I rewatch the superb dynamic between them in the pilot, I feel a little wistful for what we could have gotten.

Thursday, May 8, 2014

(Possible) Asexual Sighting: Sherlock Holmes (Sherlock)

 
As I’ve mentioned, most of the few ace-ish characters I’ve seen are unconfirmed, but they’re what I have to work with, so here we are.  Although Moffat has denied that Sherlock is asexual, I prefer to stick with what I’ve seen in-show, and I’ve seen nothing to refute my first impressions.
 
For me, it’s hard to look at Sherlock’s hero and not see an asexual (and probably an aromantic.)  We’ll start at the horse’s mouth.  Sherlock tells John that “girlfriends aren’t really [his] area” and he doesn’t have a boyfriend.  He considers himself “married to [his] work,” which doesn’t necessarily mean he’s ace – plenty of workaholic characters on TV – but it’s worth a mention.  Also, when Irene suggests that they “have dinner” (code for sex, professional dominatrices being known for their delicate euphemisms,) his response is, “Why would I have dinner if I wasn’t hungry?”  Not “too busy to eat,” or “not in in the mood to eat,” or even “what you’re serving isn’t to my taste.”  Rather, he’s not “hungry” – ie, he has no physical urge that needs feeding.
 
I haven’t seen Sherlock show a sexual/romantic interest in anyone, and he’s had options.  Molly and Irene have been into him, there’s Moriarty’s flirting, Kitty comes onto him as a ploy, he catches Janine’s eye, and he thinks John is hitting on him early on.  He’s by turns apologetic (letting John down easy,) disinterested (preferring Irene to solve puzzles rather than play sexpot,) and disdainful (laying harshly into Kitty.)  Sometimes, he misjudges someone’s attraction for him, like Molly and the Christmas gift – a surprising gaffe for a deductive genius, but common for many asexuals.  I know I’ve had to learn that, “Can I have your phone number?” may not mean, “Let’s be friends.”  Additionally, I don’t see Sherlock yearning for even a non-specified someone, desiring a sexual and/or romantic relationship with an as-yet-undiscovered-partner.
 
Irene may seem to clash with this idea; as she says, he “knew where to look.”  I argue that, while Sherlock is surprised by Irene’s nudity (who wouldn’t be?,) there’s no evidence that she arouses him.  John is flustered and wants her clothed.  Sherlock, meanwhile, discourses intelligently and is level-headed enough to correctly eyeball her measurements.  He’s intrigued by her, and I’m not ruling out intellectual/emotional attraction, but I don’t see proof that he “wants” her.
 
The strongest evidence is the most irritating:  the way characters frequently “other” Sherlock’s orientation.  John and Mrs. Hudson speculate over his seemingly-nonexistent love life when he’s out of earshot, wondering if he’s ever dated anyone and how they of all people wouldn’t know.  When Sherlock tells Mycroft that “sex doesn’t alarm [him],” his brother’s rather smug response is, “How would you know?”  Moriarty calls him “The Virgin” and Irene asks if he’s ever “had” anyone.  Janine laments of him, “I wish you weren’t… whatever you are.”  People are forever finding his seeming lack of interest abnormal/perplexing, worthy of comment/mockery.
 
If Sherlock is asexual/aromantic, what does it mean for representation?  On the downside, a lot of his traits fit unfortunate stereotypes.  Like fellow potential-ace Sheldon Cooper, he’s rude and antisocial, dismissive of anyone less intelligent than himself (in his mind, everyone.)  Many characters see him as an unfeeling robot incapable of empathy.  However, he’s entertaining, brilliant (some of his deductions make my jaw drop,) and complicated.  Though he keeps it quiet, he feels deeply and needs people more than he admits.  Plus, it’s great to see such a popular possibly-ace character.  See, writers?  Don’t be scared to include us!  We can be fun to watch!