"Better a fallen rocket than never a burst of light."
~ Tom Stoppard, The Invention of Love
Showing posts with label If Beale Street Could Talk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label If Beale Street Could Talk. Show all posts

Friday, July 12, 2024

Thoughts on the Minor Characters in If Beale Street Could Talk

If Beale Street Could Talk is such an interesting follow-up for Barry Jenkins after Moonlight. It shares a certain spiritual and emotional similarity with his Best Picture-winning debut, and it expresses a similar visual language in a different way. It stays true to his more stripped-down roots while also nodding to his newfound clout in the industry.

That latter point is best demonstrated through the prominent actors featured in small roles in the film. It’s not huge-name stars or anything—it’s not like we get Denzel Washington popping up in a single scene as, like, a subway driver or something—but there are a number of actors in this film who only appear in a scene or two, actors you wouldn’t necessarily expect to see in a part that size. It’s reflective, I think, of how much people wanted to work with Jenkins after Moonlight. It doesn’t matter to them how small the role is, they just want to be a part of this beautiful piece of art he’s creating.

That’s what I’d like to talk about today for Y tu Luna también. I already reviewed the movie when it first came out, and I knew Luna’s role was small enough that it wouldn’t warrant something like a Character Highlight post. So going into rewatching the film, I wasn’t sure what I was going to say. I think this is a good topic, though: how much these actors add to the film in their small scenes, and how Jenkins’s film gives the smallest roles space to shine.

Obviously, the acting is great throughout. Stephan James and Kiki Layne are quietly electric together as Fonny and Tish, Regina King won an Oscar for her role as Tish’s mother, and everyone else playing a member of Fonny or Tish’s families is fantastic—we get lovely performances from folks like Teyonah Parris and Colman Domingo. But today, I’m focusing specifically on these minor roles, touching on three others before I circle back to Diego Luna.

First, of course, we have Brian Tyree Henry as Fonny’s old friend Daniel Carty. In his one extended sequence in the film, Henry explodes with charisma and good humor before the scene quiets down and we see Daniel’s vulnerable side. His monologue talking about his recent experience in prison is one of the highlights of the whole film. Next up is Dave Franco as Levy, seemingly the only man in New York willing to rent to Tish and Fonny. Franco’s low-key performance is really effective here, and I love the bit where Fonny, encouraging Tish to imagine their future place, gets Levy to “help” him carry in their imaginary fridge. In the space of a few minutes, you get a genuine sense of who this guy is. And then there’s Pedro Pascal as Pietro Alvarez, who Tish’s mom Sharon meets when she goes to Puerto Rico. Again, he’s only in one scene, but plenty is accomplished about his character in his short time onscreen. While he gives off an initial air of being obstructive, and maybe untrustworthy, we see that what he really wants is to spare Victoria Rogers more grief. It’s only when Sharon goes for broke in leading Fonny’s case that he agrees to set up a meeting.

Finally, we have Luna as Pedrocito, a waiter at a restaurant Tish and Fonny visit. Despite being in two scenes, Luna’s role is the smallest and least substantial of the four, and yet, every second he’s onscreen, he simply exudes who this man is. From casually exchanging pleasantries with Fonny in Spanish, to teasing Fonny when they show up broke but hungry, to slow dancing with a partner while Fonny and Tish do the same in the foreground, he feels like a genuine person, even though we know hardly any facts about him or his life and he only has a handful of lines.

I really like that, that Pedrocito’s character still comes through when he’s such a tiny part of this story. It’s a credit to Luna’s breezy, charming performance, as well as Jenkins’s thoughtful direction. I also like how Pedrocito is used within the story, giving Tish her first glimpse of who Fonny is outside their own neighborhood. These two little scenes are so small, but both of them are beautiful moments.

I’ll end with my Yu tu Luna también addendum for If Beale Street Could Talk.

Recommend?

In General – Yes. What a gorgeously made film, shifting easily between sumptuous romance and painful issues of systemic racism.

Diego Luna – I can’t in good conscience recommend a two-hour movie purely to watch a few minutes of Luna in such a minor role. But he’s actually wonderful in it, and if you have any non-Luna-related desire to see the film, rest assured that he makes his small part of it even better.

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

If Beale Street Could Talk (2018, R)


I’ve been wanting to see this movie since I first heard about it, and it finally came to my local theater.  In a word?  Beautiful.  This is a gorgeous film that deals with harsh subject matter but still incorporates such moments of light and life.

Based on a James Baldwin novel, If Beale Street Could Talk follows Fonny and Tish’s attempt at a love story in the face of systemic racism.  The gentle tale of the young couple falling in love is marked, not only by their struggles to find anyone willing to rent a decent apartment to Black people, but also by Tish’s efforts to help Fonny when he’s arrested for a crime he didn’t commit.  Pregnant with Fonny’s child and unmarried only because the corrupt judicial system has forced them apart, Tish fights to exonerate her man.

A running theme for me in movies I’ve seen so far this winter has been “I don’t know how accurate this is,” and while this isn’t a true story, it still applies to this movie.  I’ve never read If Beale Street Could Talk, though I now want to, and so I’m not sure how well it adapts its source material.  But however it translates from the book, it plays out excellently onscreen.  The film is Barry Jenkins’s follow-up to Moonlight, and I find it stellar in pretty much every way.

First of all, the look of this film is just incredible.  The careful choices that go into the costuming, the use of light, the way every shot looks like it could be a still photo – it’s a feast for the eyes, and the beauty carries over into the music as well.  I could just look at this movie all day long.

Oh yeah, and there’s the story too!  The romance is as tender as it is sumptuous, by turns shy, passionate, and achingly pure.  I love the beautiful simplicity of all the romantic scenes, which scorch the screen in the most soulful way.  The social messages that carry into the darker sides of the story hit home really effectively – an extended scene of one of Fonny’s friends describing his experiences in prison is a standout in a film full of fine moments.  And for that matter, the film’s messages leave room for complication and nuance, such as in the way Tish’s family fights for Fonny without demonizing the woman who named him her rapist. 

What I really like is how the movie balances its light and dark aspects.  The non-linear narrative, for my money, is essential.  Told chronologically, this story of two hopeful young people would descend into bleakness and fury as we watch how inexorably their lives are marred by racial injustice.  As it is, there are still major points of despair, of anger, but they’re interspersed with lovelier, happier memories, which makes it easier to see how the characters still find things to hope in as their situations get worse.

The cast is wonderful across the board.  At the center of the story are Stephan James (who played Jesse Owens in Race a few years ago) and Kiki Layne as Fonny and Tish, and Tish’s family includes Regina King as Tish’s mother (garnering one of the film’s few Oscar nominations) and Teyonah Parris (who I really liked in Chi-Raq) as Tish’s sister.  Atlanta’s Brian Tyree Henry knocks it out of the park in a minor role, and the film also features brief appearances from Diego Luna and Pedro Pascal.

Other than Regina King’s Best Supporting Actress nomination, the film also received nods for its score and its screenplay.  While I wholeheartedly agree with these, I wish it had gotten more recognition – a Best Picture nomination, absolutely, along with its direction, cinematography, and maybe more acting.  I get that there’s so much talent every year, and maybe by the time I post about the nominations I’d have chosen for my favorite categories, some of these will get crowded out, but it feels like the Academy is framing this movie as a footnote in the story of this year’s films, and that doesn’t feel right to me.

Warnings

Violence, sexual content, language (including the N-word,) drinking/smoking, and strong thematic elements.